National Geographic sponsors a project called Enduring Voices, and they have just released a report to the press.
The map of geographical areas that show a great deal of langauge loss indicates severe language loss in temperate zones. This supports the biological wave thesis of Nettle and Romaine (Vanishing Voices 2000): “The European expansions created ‘neo-Europes,’ with primarily European peoples, landscapes of European crops and animals, and, of course European languages. These neo-Europes were mainly around the latitudes of Europe itself, on either side of the equator.” (p. 125).
The New York Times (9/19/07) has a story on the press release: Languages Die, but Not Their Last Words. Notice the focus of the Times article on the traditional ‘dictionary and text’ model for language preservation: “Their loss leaves no dictionary, no text, no record of the accumulated knowledge and history of a vanished culture.”
In the To the Editor section, Ellen Lutz of Cultural Survival criticizes the Times and National Geographic for their shallow, colonial (?) approach. Lutz notes, “Outside efforts to “preserve” language often undermine native peoples’ revitalization efforts, since they compete for the time and energy of a tiny number of elderly speakers. “